Skip to content
Arjin Lentz – creating the business you want
- – ex mysql
- – left when 500 people
- – growth in company revenue doesn’t always mean good elsewhere in business
- – remote services for mysql
- – no emergencies – time with daughter, sanity
- – started pre-GFC, prices reasonable, published, stuck to.
- – no emergencies = no worries after hours, do oncall infrastructure
- = Pool of people who won’t work weekends
- – biz processes = some cases no *real* reason why it’s done that way, but hard to change if other
- things depend on it.
- – hard to disrupt yourself
- – no borrowing, external funding etc.- big affect on how run. See rules
- – big growth , floating, being bought doesn’t always benifit customers
- – lives below the big companies, keep pricing below them
- – total value of biz-space is too small for “china” to enter
- – value curve, invest in different balance of value for your product than your competitors, feature set
- – nintendo wii, amazon
- – list of cool books
- – bigger clients require different sort of company to service
13 years of LWN – Johnathon Corbet
- – most audience lwn subscribers
- – establish 1998, 3 emplyees, x000 subscrbers, >100 company subs
- – Programmed Cray 1 – #3
- – drifted up to mid-level management in 96/97
- – little correlation between work and reward
- – Starting off “Linux Consulting” company ( eklektix.com ), start website to show how smart we are – not many $
- – we’ll do linux support – became linux support partner – program went away
- – linux training company – crowded market – didn’t work out
- – Maybe online news company
- – lesson – business skills matter
- – lesson where money coming from – pay attention to what customers want
- – be ready and will to change plans
- – acquired by tucows. went for mainly cash
- – seemed like good people, money over pure stock.
- – after dotcom crash, tucows handed back.
- – advertising revenue big drop from pre-crash
- – business very cyclical
- – real customers are the advertisers. Other sites did articles for advertising spend
- – Blocked microsoft.com, hard to block all the other variations for the name
- – other ads for dodgy products, soft core porn, political ads
- – ruins customer experience, javascript, flash, popups
- – hard audience to advertise to
- – donations didn’t work
- – July 2002 put up message that calling it quits
- – $35,000 in tip jar over 1 week. “why don’t you try subscriptions”
- – Nobody pays, Linux users less likely to pay.
- – listen to customers, especially when they are offering money
- – credit card company, reverted donation surge
- – credit cards,; extra feels for: discount rate, transaction fees, “international charges”, affinity charges, some arbitrarily
- – banks nervous about extending long to credit to merchants
- – chargebacks. customer always wins. 5 chargebacks over 10 years
- – credit card security, big dangers, huge potential downsides, pci compliance
- – credit card lessons, keep money from somewhere else
- – alternatives to Cc – 5% of stream, works okay, cost 4%
- – Checks – pain to deal with internationally
- – Corp PO cycle – big pain to deal with, Be patient
- – other services, amazon. Haven’t investigated heavily
- – lesson – have 6 months in the bank
- – where are we now
- – subscribers get access to feature content
- – free after 1-2 weeks
- – ability to disable advertising
- – other features
- – Basic cost $7/month , higher and lower cost alternatives, group subscriptions
- – aligns interests with our readers
- – people want to support us
- – subscriptions are a business expense for most people
- – non-cyclical
- – 2008
- – subs steady
- – adverting dies
- – many competitors die, freelancers writers more avaibale
- – amazon affiliate , not good results and then amazon pulled plug on all of Colorado
- – lots of revenue sources good. biggest business is 5% of revenue
- – why doesn’t it work. audience is too small
- – people don’t want to pay
- – we are terrible at selling
- – pricing is really hard, raised prices by 40%, minimal loss of subscribers
- – “design the business as a functioning system” – hard to do with periodical