lca2011 – Business of Open source miniconf – session 2

Arjin Lentz – creating the business you want

  • – ex mysql
  • – left when 500 people
  • – growth in company revenue doesn’t always mean good elsewhere in business
  • – remote services for mysql
  • – no emergencies – time with daughter, sanity
  • – started pre-GFC, prices reasonable, published, stuck to.
  • – no emergencies = no worries after hours, do oncall infrastructure
  • = Pool of people who won’t work weekends
  • – biz processes = some cases no *real* reason why it’s done that way, but hard to change if other
  • things depend on it.
  • – hard to disrupt yourself
  • – no borrowing, external funding etc.- big affect on how run. See rules
  • – big growth , floating, being bought doesn’t always benifit customers
  • – lives below the big companies, keep pricing below them
  • – total value of biz-space is too small for “china” to enter
  • – value curve, invest in different balance of value for your product than your competitors, feature set
  • – nintendo wii, amazon
  • – list of cool books
  • – bigger clients require different sort of company to service

13 years of LWN – Johnathon Corbet

  • – most audience lwn subscribers
  • – establish 1998, 3 emplyees, x000 subscrbers, >100 company subs
  • – Programmed Cray 1 – #3
  • – drifted up to mid-level management in 96/97
  • – little correlation between work and reward
  • – Starting off “Linux Consulting” company ( eklektix.com ), start website to show how smart we are – not many $
  • – we’ll do linux support – became linux support partner – program went away
  • – linux training company – crowded market – didn’t work out
  • – Maybe online news company
  • – lesson – business skills matter
  • – lesson where money coming from – pay attention to what customers want
  • – be ready and will to change plans
  • – acquired by tucows. went for mainly cash
  • – seemed like good people, money over pure stock.
  • – after dotcom crash, tucows handed back.
  • – advertising revenue big drop from pre-crash
  • – business very cyclical
  • – real customers are the advertisers. Other sites did articles for advertising spend
  • – Blocked microsoft.com, hard to block all the other variations for the name
  • – other ads for dodgy products, soft core porn, political ads
  • – ruins customer experience, javascript, flash, popups
  • – hard audience to advertise to
  • – donations didn’t work
  • – July 2002 put up message that calling it quits
  • – $35,000 in tip jar over 1 week. “why don’t you try subscriptions”
  • – Nobody pays, Linux users less likely to pay.
  • – listen to customers, especially when they are offering money
  • – credit card company, reverted donation surge
  • – credit cards,; extra feels for: discount rate, transaction fees, “international charges”, affinity charges, some arbitrarily
  • – banks nervous about extending long to credit to merchants
  • – chargebacks. customer always wins. 5 chargebacks over 10 years
  • – credit card security, big dangers, huge potential downsides, pci compliance
  • – credit card lessons, keep money from somewhere else
  • – alternatives to Cc – 5% of stream, works okay, cost 4%
  • – Checks – pain to deal with internationally
  • – Corp PO cycle – big pain to deal with, Be patient
  • – other services, amazon. Haven’t investigated heavily
  • – lesson – have 6 months in the bank
  • – where are we now
  • – subscribers get access to feature content
  • – free after 1-2 weeks
  • – ability to disable advertising
  • – other features
  • – Basic cost $7/month , higher and lower cost alternatives, group subscriptions
  • – aligns interests with our readers
  • – people want to support us
  • – subscriptions are a business expense for most people
  • – non-cyclical
  • – 2008
  • – subs steady
  • – adverting dies
  • – many competitors die, freelancers writers more avaibale
  • – amazon affiliate , not good results and then amazon pulled plug on all of Colorado
  • – lots of revenue sources good. biggest business is 5% of revenue
  • – why doesn’t it work. audience is too small
  • – people don’t want to pay
  • – we are terrible at selling
  • – pricing is really hard, raised prices by 40%, minimal loss of subscribers
  • – “design the business as a functioning system” – hard to do with periodical
Share